The new Florida agriculture bill aims to restrict discussions about the health risks of certain foods, particularly sugar. This legislation could lead to severe consequences for those speaking out against harmful food practices, essentially weaponizing defamation against critics.
Currently, Florida’s law allows farmers to sue those they believe are spreading false information about food, referred to as ‘food libel.’ However, this new bill expands the definition of disparagement dramatically, making it applicable to all agricultural products, including sugar. This means that criticisms regarding pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural practices could be silenced under this bill.
Internal documents from large agricultural companies reveal that the true purpose of the food disparagement law is not to protect farmers, but to eliminate dissent and promote a narrative favorable to the food industry. The chilling effect this law would have on free speech is alarming, as it could discourage journalists, activists, and health advocates from discussing well-documented health issues associated with sugar and other agricultural practices.
This isn’t just a local issue; since Florida’s crops are widely distributed across the nation, the implications of this legislation could have far-reaching effects. The potential for lawsuits could deter individuals from sharing truthful information about food health risks.
If you want to take action, consider signing this petition to oppose the bill: https://www.mahaaction.com/bill-details?id=1911402
For additional insights and tools to enhance your health journey, download Dr. Berg’s Free Daily Health Routine here: https://drbrg.co/3Zh3TVt
Stay informed and ready to act, as this could impact the future health discussions and practices across the United States.
By Dr. Eric Berg DC